Updated Post: Arbsorption Of Cognition Inward The Estimator Age
Hello again, --> GENERAL WARNING: If y'all don't similar to read a lot of text online, blow off this post! Also, ZOOM OUT when you're done reading for a dainty surprise! It's a tech persuasion slice together with won't solve whatever problems that can't hold upwards cured yesteryear slowing your life downwardly a chip together with paying to a greater extent than attending to the moment. That beingness said, fifty-fifty though this text is meant to hold upwards right inward a higher house the "F" I'm going to seat this disclaimer hither anyway, merely to run into how many complaints I get. This post is total of misleading, together with oft completely incorrect, data together with a few typos. For instance, I'm good aware that the foursquare of 25 is non 3. Sometimes, I usage the wrong instance (we instead of I) on purpose. I don't address merely about points at all. Depending upon how merely about folks read
online (based on my ain stockpile of comments together with responses to posts) y'all may very
well receive got either missed what I merely wrote or volition receive got forgotten it yesteryear the fourth dimension you
get to the holler for where I brand that faux assertion. Hopefully we're below the Adsense block now, then nosotros tin plow over the axe start out alongside the superlative of the "F."
Today I'm going to follow upwards on post nosotros did a practiced long piece agone regarding absorption of noesis inward the figurer age. And I'm going to larn a few things out of the vogue right off the bat, merely inward instance you're the type of "F" reader they holler to inward that previous post (more on that farther downwardly the page ;) I was originally going to post merely about ridiculously bad code, explicate that I was doing it on purpose, together with why, alongside text inward the "F pattern" together with run into how many people all the same complained most the shoddy character of the code. Instead, I looked dorsum at merely about older posts where the code was intentionally bad (in gild to illustrate concepts related to the porting of rhythm out to Perl or other programming languages to a greater extent than easily - since if 2 dissimilar languages are to a greater extent than structurally together with visually similar, it's to a greater extent than oft than non easier for anyone to procedure their ain translation - my opinion, of class ;) together with decided that, since I've already done that, it would hold upwards inexpensive to do it again. Easy for me. Lame for you. Believe it or not, that master serial of posts on porting continued to generate complaint mails, fifty-fifty though the follow-up (linked to above) together with rationale was spelled out inside the superlative department of the post together with is merely a pocket-size purpose of a pretty lean read; peculiarly when compared to the endless lunatic yammering I slap downwardly on the virtual page exhibit ;) If that link generates to a greater extent than complaints most improper or inefficient code we'll hold upwards numb alongside indifference... There's alone then much caring 1 human tin plow over the axe do ;) This has been the (possibly slightly goofed upwards yesteryear Adsense) superlative of the "F."
instead, i'm going to endeavor to explicate (and receive got fun with)
one basic concept inward the aRticle from our prEvious post on figurer reADing habiTs.
tHE writeR begIns the article (quite cleverly, actually, since he's assuming
you'll hold upwards the type of reader he describes together with packs that data inward the
relevant places) exploring the theory that most children (and a lot of teenaGers
and adults) are "f" readers when it comes to reading text on tHe inTernet. the
"f" is Somewhat of a double entendre (I'm going alongside the strict french translation
of "DoublE understanding" since the term is mOstly used to depict a "phrase"
rather than a unmarried alphabetic character ;) inward this case, since it's used equally both a mnemonic
(the less to recall y'all by, my love ;) for "F"ast together with equally a visual descripTion
of the patH most onlIne reader'S eyes follow when reading books or text on the
comPuter screen. if you've reAd this faR, the remAinder of the post should be
completely uninteresting. nosotros tried to do a few thinGs on purpose to brand this
post enteRtAining on to a greater extent than than merely a Plain level. wHatever doesn't brand sense,
probably volition when y'all run into the wood :)
Just for the record, I prefer to read books on paper. Not because reading online
makes me lose command similar Patty Duke inward the presence of a hot Canis familiaris (see Mission And Policy Statement for farther details.
Please complaint that this weblog accepts comments via email only. See our Mission And Policy Statement for farther details.
online (based on my ain stockpile of comments together with responses to posts) y'all may very
well receive got either missed what I merely wrote or volition receive got forgotten it yesteryear the fourth dimension you
get to the holler for where I brand that faux assertion. Hopefully we're below the Adsense block now, then nosotros tin plow over the axe start out alongside the superlative of the "F."
Today I'm going to follow upwards on post nosotros did a practiced long piece agone regarding absorption of noesis inward the figurer age. And I'm going to larn a few things out of the vogue right off the bat, merely inward instance you're the type of "F" reader they holler to inward that previous post (more on that farther downwardly the page ;) I was originally going to post merely about ridiculously bad code, explicate that I was doing it on purpose, together with why, alongside text inward the "F pattern" together with run into how many people all the same complained most the shoddy character of the code. Instead, I looked dorsum at merely about older posts where the code was intentionally bad (in gild to illustrate concepts related to the porting of rhythm out to Perl or other programming languages to a greater extent than easily - since if 2 dissimilar languages are to a greater extent than structurally together with visually similar, it's to a greater extent than oft than non easier for anyone to procedure their ain translation - my opinion, of class ;) together with decided that, since I've already done that, it would hold upwards inexpensive to do it again. Easy for me. Lame for you. Believe it or not, that master serial of posts on porting continued to generate complaint mails, fifty-fifty though the follow-up (linked to above) together with rationale was spelled out inside the superlative department of the post together with is merely a pocket-size purpose of a pretty lean read; peculiarly when compared to the endless lunatic yammering I slap downwardly on the virtual page exhibit ;) If that link generates to a greater extent than complaints most improper or inefficient code we'll hold upwards numb alongside indifference... There's alone then much caring 1 human tin plow over the axe do ;) This has been the (possibly slightly goofed upwards yesteryear Adsense) superlative of the "F."
instead, i'm going to endeavor to explicate (and receive got fun with)
one basic concept inward the aRticle from our prEvious post on figurer reADing habiTs.
tHE writeR begIns the article (quite cleverly, actually, since he's assuming
you'll hold upwards the type of reader he describes together with packs that data inward the
relevant places) exploring the theory that most children (and a lot of teenaGers
and adults) are "f" readers when it comes to reading text on tHe inTernet. the
"f" is Somewhat of a double entendre (I'm going alongside the strict french translation
of "DoublE understanding" since the term is mOstly used to depict a "phrase"
rather than a unmarried alphabetic character ;) inward this case, since it's used equally both a mnemonic
(the less to recall y'all by, my love ;) for "F"ast together with equally a visual descripTion
of the patH most onlIne reader'S eyes follow when reading books or text on the
comPuter screen. if you've reAd this faR, the remAinder of the post should be
completely uninteresting. nosotros tried to do a few thinGs on purpose to brand this
post enteRtAining on to a greater extent than than merely a Plain level. wHatever doesn't brand sense,
probably volition when y'all run into the wood :)
Just for the record, I prefer to read books on paper. Not because reading online
makes me lose command similar Patty Duke inward the presence of a hot Canis familiaris (see Mission And Policy Statement for farther details.
Please complaint that this weblog accepts comments via email only. See our Mission And Policy Statement for farther details.
0 Response to "Updated Post: Arbsorption Of Cognition Inward The Estimator Age"
Post a Comment